By: James Wilson
Posted: 10/31/2013
I remember the first time I had to have an honest conversation with a parent about why their child was doing so poorly in school. If they only knew that, as a former teacher and administrator, I was the one who felt like the failure.
After all, it wasn't the child's fault his class was terribly overcrowded, there were few to no books in the library, there were few course options available, or he only had a 30 per cent chance of graduating high school.
Having to tell a parent their child is not getting the education they deserve is a tough thing to do. Especially since we all want the same things for our children -- to see them thrive, be challenged, have dreams and prosper.
Yet for First Nations parents living on-reserve, it's a reality their children will not have the same opportunities as other children across the country.
By way of background, education in Canada is the purview of the provinces, except on-reserve where it is a federal responsibility. For decades, First Nations leaders have fought to gain a semblance of control over the federal system their children were a part of. However, it wasn't until the mid-1990s many reserves were finally successful in wresting control and building their own institutions.
In Opaskwayak, my home community near The Pas, the process first began when we created a kindergarten in the basement of a former old folks' home. Year after year, we acquired more space, more teachers and more students. Finally, our kids were learning Cree, English, math and science from Cree teachers as part of the Opaskwayak Educational Authority.
More commonly known, off-reserve, as a school division, today's OEA provides a well-balanced, quality K-12 education in both of its schools, Joe A. Ross and Oscar Lathlin Collegiate. It is just one beacon of hope for Canadians looking to repair a system that was first promised by the Crown when, in 1871's Treaty 1, Her Majesty agreed to "maintain a school on each reserve hereby made whenever the Indians of the reserve should desire it."
What does this "treaty right" mean in 2013? A combination of underfunding and lack of laws governing education on-reserve has created a stalemate of accusations with the federal government pointing the finger at First Nations educators saying, "You must be accountable" and First Nations educators pointing the finger at government saying, "We are in a crisis and we can't do anything without more funding."
How we react to the proposed First Nations Education Act will determine if this stare-down continues or if we end up creating a system that finally restores hope and provides equal opportunities for future generations.
The draft legislation has some positives and negatives.
On the pro side, it would allow First Nations education authorities to amalgamate into one school board or ministry in Manitoba. Not only is this long overdue, it is a move that would allow both thriving and struggling First Nations schools to finally work together.
Another plus is the language of the draft legislation recognizes the importance of culture and language in First Nations communities and the vital role these play in a successful on-reserve school system. Retaining and fostering cultural growth cannot be underestimated.
The implementation of proposed minimum standards for teaching days, teacher certification and assessment will be problematic to many, but if First Nations are directing these standards, which we must not forget can include language proficiency in Cree, Ojibwa, Dakota or Dene, then this will help ensure First Nations students can prosper in settings outside of their respective communities.
In the cons column, the idea of having a provincial superintendent or consultant inspecting schools harkens back to Indian Act language and will find very few supporters.
If you can imagine, I have seen federally funded school evaluations where the evaluator has cut and pasted the school name into a previously re-written document and even missed a few cut and pastes. Oops.
The major deficiency of the draft legislation is it comes with no financial guarantees. Schools on-reserve in Canada are underfunded. Period. There must be a paragraph that ensures First Nations schools will be funded at levels equitable to comparable provincial schools. If legislation is about sticks and carrots, then this is the carrot that matters.
There is an old expression among educators that "students don't fail, schools fail," which is why both sides need to negotiate on this issue. That is what the original treaty partners envisioned and what young First Nations students across Canada deserve. It's time everyone worked toward at least a passing grade.
James Wilson is commissioner of the Treaty Relations Commission of Manitoba, a neutral body mandated to encourage discussion, facilitate public understanding, and enhance mutual respect between all peoples in Manitoba.
++++++++++
Fro
Judith Rae
October 24, 2013
This week, the Government of Canada released a documentcontaining the text of its proposed First Nations Education Act. It did not come as a surprise - the federal government's education reform initiative has been heating up tensions with First Nations all year, as I discussed in an earlier blog post.
First Nations are raising many strong concerns about this proposed legislation. Probably the two leading concerns are:
Today's article in the Globe and Mail discussed these concerns further, and shows how real progress that was being made through First Nation education efforts in Nova Scotia and British Columbia is now being eroded.
This OKT memo provides a summary of the proposed First Nations Education Act and answers to some general questions about it. The memo is intended to provide First Nations and members of the public with information about the proposal. It does not contain legal advice. Please contact OKT if you are looking for further analysis.
OKT MEMO:
Information about Canada's proposed First Nations Education Act
Judith Rae, OKT
On October 22, 2013, the Government of Canada released a document that contains the draft text of its First Nations Education Act.
I will refer to this as the Proposed FN Education Act.1
This memo provides answers to some general questions about the Proposed FN Education Act. It does not contain legal advice.
Please contact OKT if you are looking for further analysis.General QuestionsWhat is this Proposed FN Education Act document?
It is a document containing the draft text of the First Nations Education Act proposed by the Government of Canada. AANDC says it is subject to further comments.
What did Canada do before releasing this Proposed FN Education Act document?
Last year, following the Canada-AFN National Panel on First Nations Education, Canada announced that it would introduce a First Nations Education Act by September 2014. It has taken a number of steps to "consult" about it. Releasing the Proposed FN Education Act is the latest step in that process. Previously, Canada released a Discussion Guide in late 2012, a Blueprint of the legislation in July 2013, and held several meetings and other sessions.2
What happens next?
The next step will be introducing the bill in Parliament. Since the Conservatives have a majority government, they will be able to pass it into law if they choose to.
Can our First Nation choose whether or not to participate in this new education law?
No. There is no opt-in or opt-out - this legislation would apply automatically to all First Nations across the board. The only exceptions are First Nations with self-government agreements dealing with education, listed in a special exemption clause. Over the long term, a way out of this FN Education Act could be to negotiate a self-government agreement on education.3
___________________
1 The full title of the document is Working Together for First Nation Students: A Proposal for a Bill on First Nation Education, October 2013, available at: http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/DAM/DAM-INTER-HQEDU/STAGING/texte-text/prop....
2 For more information, see: http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1382480394651/1382480470754.
3 For example, Anishnabek Nation (UOI) negotiated an Education Agreement with Canada and Ontario, but it has not yet been ratified or come into force pending resolution of the financial arrangements. See: http://www.anishinabek.ca/roj/education-overview.asp.
_____________________
Under this Proposed FN Education Act, there are a few minor details of the system that the First Nation could alter by passing a by-law. This memo does not go into those details.
Is Canada's proposal consistent with the recommendations of the National Panel?
No. The National Panel did recommend legislation, but said it should be "co-created", in partnership between First Nations and Canada. That has not happened. Many of the National Panel's recommendations about the content of legislation are also not followed, for example: 4
What are some of the concerns that First Nations have raised about this?
Many strong concerns have been raised. Probably the two leading concerns are:
Federal accountability to ensure adequate funding has not been addressed. First Nations could be left unable to comply with the requirements, and meanwhile the underlying problems in First Nations education would not be solved if the problem of inadequate and unequal funding levels is not fixed.
___________________
4 See the Panel's report for more details: http://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/DAM/DAM-INTER-HQEDU/STAGING/texte-text/nat_....
___________________
What does the Proposed FN Education Act say?
Note that the summary below sometimes refers to regulations, but the regulations have not been released yet. The Act gives a very broad regulation power to the Minister (AANDC) -regulations can easily be made or changed by the Minister, on a wide variety of topics, without necessarily much review. Unlike the Act itself, regulations will not go through Parliament.
Canada will be required to:
First Nations will be required to:
__________
5 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 31.
6 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 6(1) and s. 8.
7 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 17.
8 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 13(2).
9 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 6(3).
_____________
____________
10 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 9.
11 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 11(1).
12 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 15 and s. 24(1)(a).
13 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 20.
14 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 21 and s. 22(1).
15 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 23(1), (2) and (5).
____________
First Nation parents:
Provisions limiting Canada's liability:
Other:
For more information:
Judith Rae
OKT LLP
jrae@oktlaw.com
www.oktlaw.com
416-981-9349
_____________________
16 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 23(3) and (4).
17 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 24.
18 Proposed FN Education Act, ss. 25-26
19 Proposed FN Education Act, s. 27.
20 Proposed FN Education Act, ss. 28-30.