AFN National Chief wants INAC disbanded for separate governance system with First Nations

From the Globe and Mail

First Nations chief wants to disband Aboriginal Affairs department

GLORIA GALLOWAY - Tuesday, Jul. 12, 2011

OTTAWA - The federal aboriginal affairs department should be scrapped in favour of a new model of native governance, which would mark a major step on the road to independence, the head of Canada’s largest aboriginal organization says.

National Chief Shawn Atleo will tell the annual general meeting of the Assembly of First Nations in Moncton, N.B., on Tuesday that the federal Department of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development should be replaced by two new entities: One to focus on the relationship between first nations and the Crown, the other to continue providing services to aboriginals.

The call is part of the AFN national chief’s long-term goal of fostering a separate governance system for Canada’s first nations, ending the more paternalistic system that currently exists. Mr. Atleo, who has called for a “clear plan” to move away from the Indian Act, will present a brief called “Pursuing First Nation Self-Determination,” a copy of which has been obtained by The Globe and Mail.

Since taking office, Mr. Atleo has worked to build his own relationship with the Conservative government – in particular with Prime Minister Stephen Harper. And the push for more autonomy for aboriginals and less direct government intervention in their affairs is likely to sit well with Mr. Harper’s Conservative base if it also means fewer subsidies from Ottawa to reserves.

But some within the Conservative Party are wary of creating a series of aboriginal nation states within Canada.

Mr. Atleo envisions an arrangement that would allow first nations to build their own economies. And, in his brief, he argues for “new fiscal transfer arrangements” that would adhere to common principles of fairness and equality among all jurisdictions.

He points out that many independent studies conducted over the past three decades have examined ways to give Canada’s first nations more jurisdiction over their affairs.

“All point to ultimately replacing or phasing out the Department of Indian Affairs (recently renamed the Department of Aboriginal Affairs by the federal Conservative government) and establishing new contact points that properly reflect the nation-to-nation relationship and financing arrangements appropriate to a nation-to-nation relationship and reflective of the Crown’s fiduciary duties to support the implementation of first nations government,” the report says.

Aboriginal Affairs Minister John Duncan did not respond on Monday to requests for comment on Mr. Atleo’s vision. But his spokeswoman, Michelle Yao, said: “Our government is strongly committed to addressing challenges within the Indian Act. We are supporting investments and partnerships to address these, including legislation, based on partnerships and agreements with first nations, provinces and territories.”

Mr. Harper has worked to build a relationship with first nations people, issuing an apology for residential schools in 2008. In recognition of that action, he was named an honorary chief of the first nations Blood Tribe in Alberta on Monday, and has agreed join a first nations-Crown gathering that is expected to take place later this year.

Mr. Atleo would like to see Ottawa and the first nations negotiate with each other from a position of equals. It is a structural change, he says in the report, that would better ensure that money intended to help first nations is used for that purpose “as opposed to supporting increased bureaucratic presence.”

A source within the AFN said Monday that the government does not do a good job of delivering services to first-nations members and it is time to create “leaner and more efficient entities” that would support native autonomy.

+++++++++

From Calgary Herald

Dreaming big - Native self-government must be preceded by reforms

Calgary Herald July 14, 2011

Assembly of First Nations Chief Shawn Atleo's idea that the federal government should negotiate with Canada's aboriginals as one government to another suffers from the twin flaws of naivete and vagueness.

Atleo wants to see the federal Aboriginal Affairs department replaced with an office that would handle such negotiations and he wants the Indian Act abolished. Atleo's yearning for a new way of doing things is understandable. It is also justified.

The old way has been bogged down in an elephantine bureaucracy in which fiscal accountability often appears to be ephemeral and individual initiative gets smothered under the leaden weight of policies, procedures and dust-covered rules.

The Indian Act needs revamping, updating and streamlining. However, with all due respect to, and sympathy for, Atleo's aspirations, there are long-standing problems in First Nations communities that must be resolved before these communities can be declared ready to assume the mantle of an equal-status governance with Ottawa. Foremost among those sticky issues is accountability. Too many instances of corruption among chiefs and band councillors have been documented, along with rampant nepotism and resulting intimidation in the hierarchies governing reserves.

There has been a lack of transparency and accountability for the use of public money, most visible in the situations in which chiefs maintain sumptuous homes in neighbouring cities while ordinary reserve residents live in overcrowded, tumbledown houses under boil-water advisories or with no running water at all.

Moreover, individual bands have not necessarily been successful in dealing with the social problems on reserves -the substance abuse, the domestic violence, the lack of initiative for entrepreneurial opportunities and job creation. Not every band enjoys the geographical luck that Chief Clarence Louie's Osoyoos band does in B.C., which has enabled it to get into the business of wineries, golf courses and the like, but the possibilities are out there, requiring some imagination and initiative.

Nor does Atleo define just what a "government" is. There are more than 630 First Nations bands across Canada. Obviously, negotiating individually with 630 separate nations is not feasible.

Under what self-governance umbrella, then, would these bands fall? Certainly, it would not be under the aegis of the Assembly of First Nations, which does not truly represent reserve residents, for its leader is elected only by the chiefs of each band; reserve residents have no vote.

Also, the diverse needs of various bands, scattered across this vast land, do not make for a comfortable one-size-fits-all model of governance.

Atleo is a dreamer, and without dreams, nothing would happen. But he must first deal with the staggering number of problems on reserves, and aid in restoring democracy to band councils, as well as clarify what a workable governance model looks like before any First Nations community or group of communities, can be called a government on par with Ottawa.